<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Curious Drake &#187; canon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://curiousdrake.com/tag/canon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://curiousdrake.com</link>
	<description>To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk. - Thomas Edison</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 02:33:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Playing with Olympus E-520</title>
		<link>http://curiousdrake.com/playing-with-e-520/</link>
		<comments>http://curiousdrake.com/playing-with-e-520/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo and Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-520]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curiousdrake.com/?p=270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Olympus E-520 is a really neat little dSLR. It is all plastic, but does not feel flimsy. In addition, Olympus has great menu structure. It is easy to navigate, contrary to the most of the reviews that I have read. &#8230; <a href="http://curiousdrake.com/playing-with-e-520/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olympus E-520 is a really neat little dSLR. It is all plastic, but does not feel flimsy. In addition, Olympus has great menu structure. It is easy to navigate, contrary to the most of the reviews that I have read. It does have highlight clipping problem, but it is still manageable. I would readily carry this camera with me over my bulky Canon 7D. Oly&#8217;s image quality is not as high, but it is good enough when you choose between convenience and quality.</p>
<p>Pretty good performance, RAW supports and all bells and whistles possible in a dSLR at a price point and convenience of a prosumer Point and Shoot. Here is a couple of shots made with this camera.  Judge for yourself:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="Outdoors in bright sunlight" src="http://www.fashionistatalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/RS191590.jpg" alt="" width="448" height="336" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="Some highlight clipping" src="http://www.fashionistatalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/RS181546.jpg" alt="" width="461" height="398" /><br />
<div class="imagecaptioneasy imagecaptioneasy_nter size-full wp-image-271" style="width:332px;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-271" title="Outdoors, low light, on-camera flash" src="http://curiousdrake.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/RS231744.JPG" alt="Outdoors, low light, on-camera flash" width="332" height="640" /><br style="clear:both" /><span>Outdoors, low light, on-camera flash</span></div><br />
<div class="imagecaptioneasy imagecaptioneasy_nter size-full wp-image-272" style="width:421px;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-272" title="Indoors, off-camera flash" src="http://curiousdrake.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/RS231762.JPG" alt="Indoors, off-camera flash" width="421" height="640" /><br style="clear:both" /><span>Indoors, off-camera flash</span></div></p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Playing+with+Olympus+E-520+http%3A%2F%2Ftinyurl.com%2F3karrtm" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://curiousdrake.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-big2.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div><p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://curiousdrake.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://curiousdrake.com/playing-with-e-520/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The search is over</title>
		<link>http://curiousdrake.com/the-search-is-over/</link>
		<comments>http://curiousdrake.com/the-search-is-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo and Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-520]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P&S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Point and Shoot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curiousdrake.com/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why bother with a prosumer P&#038;S camera if you can get an Olympus E-520 dSLR for $329 refurbished at B&#038;H? I decided to go with a two lens kit that a managed to buy for 400 dollars. You cannot buy &#8230; <a href="http://curiousdrake.com/the-search-is-over/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why bother with a prosumer P&#038;S camera if you can get an Olympus E-520  dSLR for $329 refurbished at  B&#038;H? I decided to go with a two lens kit that a managed to buy for 400 dollars. You cannot buy a used Canon G10 for that amount of money. Olympus offers so much more value! I am looking forward to playing with the camera more. This is my first digital Oly. I used to shoot an OM10 a little bit. The 520 is not much bigger than the OM10. </p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=The+search+is+over+http%3A%2F%2Ftinyurl.com%2F3ld6w2t" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://curiousdrake.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-big2.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div><p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://curiousdrake.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://curiousdrake.com/the-search-is-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obsessed by off-camera flash</title>
		<link>http://curiousdrake.com/obsessed-by-off-camera-flash/</link>
		<comments>http://curiousdrake.com/obsessed-by-off-camera-flash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photo and Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lumix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off-camera flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powershot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curiousdrake.com/?p=254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cameras that made to the short list are Canon G11, SX10 IS, Panasonic Lumix G1, and Olympus Pen EP1. Sony does not produce P&#038;S with external flash anymore. It seems that the last model was DSW-828. Sony was kicking everybody&#8217;s &#8230; <a href="http://curiousdrake.com/obsessed-by-off-camera-flash/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cameras that made to the short list are Canon G11, SX10 IS, Panasonic Lumix G1, and Olympus Pen EP1.</p>
<p>Sony does not produce P&#038;S with external flash anymore. It seems that the last model was <strong>DSW-828</strong>. Sony was kicking everybody&#8217;s behind with that camera back in the days. They announced it in August of 2003. The camera still looks as an attractive choice, despite the size and hefty 2 pounds weight.The Zeiss T* lens that comes with it makes up most of the camera size, and I can tolerate the heaviness because all of it is wholesome glass and heavy duty metal body. Nice camera&#8230; if I could get it for 250 dollars, I will not think twice.</p>
<p><strong>Canon PowerShot G11</strong> is the best choice. It is syncing at <strong>1/2000</strong> of a second without any hacks. Canon guys are definitely plaining on riding the wave of people like me &#8211; obsessed by  off camera flash. My PocketWizard will stay in the hot shoe most of the time. But, alas, 70% of coverage of the optical viewfinder &#8211; Canon, you must be joking&#8230;</p>
<p>Second choice is PowerShot SX10 IS. This camera is no G11 of cause, but it can be hacked neatly using CHDK hack firmware add-on. SX10 IS as well as G11 can do wanders with this hack. Syncing at 1/60000 of a second, motion detection shooting that can take a picture of lightening, time lapse shooting and many other neat things, including playing games on the camera. </p>
<p>Panasonic Lumix G1 has an interchangeable lens mount. This is cool, but is pretty much all cool things about it. Image quality is not on par with the G11. The lens could be Leica, because it is supposed to be a high end camera. Panasonic puts Leica on the much lower class cameras. This cheapens the brand somewhat, but it is hard to screw up Leica name. It is the legend of photography.  The electronic viewfinder is somewhat attractive because it is nice and bright, right form the Panasonic professional video cameras. In the later models Panasonic dropped this viewfinder. I am not sure if I can have very short sync speeds with this camera thought. Can anybody tell me? I will be happy to hear from you.</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Obsessed+by+off-camera+flash+http%3A%2F%2Ftinyurl.com%2F44mgox4" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://curiousdrake.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-big2.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div><p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://curiousdrake.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://curiousdrake.com/obsessed-by-off-camera-flash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

